ponzie at 10h21
11
Feb
2009
Combining Factless Facts and Bridges - sensible or not?
We are working in a MS SQL Server 2005 environment using SSIS to populate our DW DB and SSAS to build our OLAP database from that DW DB.
It is not a huge database in the scheme of things - 28 million payments, 6 million customers, 2 million membership rows (after type 2 changes applied).
We have a scenario where our 'Customers' can have one or more 'Memberships'.
Each of these are created as Dimension
We are working in a MS SQL Server 2005 environment using SSIS to populate our DW DB and SSAS to build our OLAP database from that DW DB.
It is not a huge database in the scheme of things - 28 million payments, 6 million customers, 2 million membership rows (after type 2 changes applied).
We have a scenario where our 'Customers' can have one or more 'Memberships'.
Each of these are created as Dimension
About
This topic belongs to the forum
Data Warehousing and Business Intelligence based on dimensional modeling and the Kimball Lifecycle.
- Numbers of topics : 1842
- Numbers of messages : 8656
- Numbers of users : 3787
- Numbers of points : 1497
Similar topics
Hi,
I am having this question for long time on fact less fact. Whenever I read about fact less fact, all the documents mention about what is fact less fact and how to use it and where to use it. My questions is why it is needed? When there is no fact
We have 2 entities in our logical model for authorizations. One for inpatient authorizations and another for service authorizations. They are both children of the parent authorization entity.
We are considering combining them into a single
1) Going though few issues where snowflake is mentioned, few confusion arises.
Few people say that "snowflake helps when you are aggregating on higher level attributes which otherwise you would get by applying DISTINCT from the dimension."
But in
Just wanted to get some information on pros/cons with regards to joining my fact table with a factless fact. What we are discovering is that if we keep all non-grain defining dimension sk on every fact table, our maintenance increases tremendously. Even
Factless fact table versus Dimension (downstream implications)
Let's keep this simple for discussion purposes (Im leaving off dimensions and surrogate key fields on fact table, it really isnt this small)
We are trying to build a dimensional DW for
Forums from same category
Techy Boards, a growing technology discussion forum! For fans of nintendo, xbox, playstation or anything else!
Free forum : hi. Free forum : 2709rsgamboa6219. Free forum,
Free forum : Forum IT Teknik Komputer dan Jaringan SMKN 1 SLAWI
LEGO Island Discussion, modding, news and more!
HmongThoobNtiajTeb. com/
Search
Informations
4 Replies For the topic :
"Combining Factless Facts and Bridges - sensible or not?"
This topic has been viewed 3019 times.
Last message :
11/02/2009 at 10h21 by "ponzie"






