mrkb72 at 03h32
22
Mar
2011
Aggregate Dimension Based on Fact?
I have a business requirement to report the distinct accounts from a fact transaction table by the aggregate number of transactions by Merchant.
Let me explain in more detail:
The fact table has the following fields (simplified for this example):
AccountID, MerchantID, TxnAmount
I have 3 measures in my cube: TxnAmount, Count, Distinct Count By AccountID (In a separate measure group)
AccountI
I have a business requirement to report the distinct accounts from a fact transaction table by the aggregate number of transactions by Merchant.
Let me explain in more detail:
The fact table has the following fields (simplified for this example):
AccountID, MerchantID, TxnAmount
I have 3 measures in my cube: TxnAmount, Count, Distinct Count By AccountID (In a separate measure group)
AccountI
About
This topic belongs to the forum
Data Warehousing and Business Intelligence based on dimensional modeling and the Kimball Lifecycle.
- Numbers of topics : 1842
- Numbers of messages : 8656
- Numbers of users : 3787
- Numbers of points : 1497
Similar topics
Recently our data model work group has been discussing expanding/changing our Date Dimension to more of a time dimension to encompass smart keys to faciliate the Month and Quarterly fact tables, and still use the new time Dimension surrgoate key.
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if it's acceptable to calculate an aggregate_value by aggregating a measurement from the fact_table and by subtracting from a value located in another dimension.
Hi,
Is it acceptable to create an aggregate fact table from the staging tables after you have cleaned out the data in staging? I know usually you're supposed to create aggregate fact tables from the fact/dimension tables, however can it be done straigh
I am in a bit of a dilemma in that if let's say we have a Product dimension needed for the Sales fact table but our forecast fact table is at the ProductCategory level. The Kimball toolkit suggests to still keep the Product Catergory attributes in the
If creating a roll up fact table would you consider using something other than the surrogate key for your date dimension join? I would not but my colleagues think we should be using month_id for example if we are creating a monthly roll up table from a
Forums from same category
Free forum : Forum IT Teknik Komputer dan Jaringan SMKN 1 SLAWI
LEGO Island Discussion, modding, news and more!
Free forum : hi. Free forum : 2709rsgamboa6219. Free forum,
Techy Boards, a growing technology discussion forum! For fans of nintendo, xbox, playstation or anything else!
HmongThoobNtiajTeb. com/
Search
Informations
2 Replies For the topic :
"Aggregate Dimension Based on Fact?"
This topic has been viewed 820 times.
Last message :
22/03/2011 at 03h32 by "mrkb72"






